> If you don't have enough memory for the OS to maintain the important > stuff in the buffer cache, then mem_cache isn't going to help because > it will just shove other important stuff out of memory and onto disk. Yes, it is. But it's quite diffucult to explain why without detailed description of our application. Some of our proxies have dead disks already and they are still in production just because they don't need disk at all. We can't replace broken disks by ourselfs cuz they are not on same continent we are and ISPs are bunch of lamers. Memory cache is working and saving significant traffic (money) to our main site. Part of page I got is plain HTML and mem cache is enabled just for images. Sending parts of cached pages which should not be cached at all to another users is definitely security flaw and should be fixed. -- Pavel Mateja --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|