Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote: > 1. Is HE.net making a mistake in using access_log to count bandwidth? > 1a. What would be the right way to do it? > 1b. Are they doing it this way because they're using some existing > tool that does it this way? > 1c. Are other hosts doing it this way, and therefore are mistakenly > over-measuring and over-charging customers? See mod_logio, and there is no affirmative means to know that the client stuck around to receive every last byte was sent. That is not covered by the HTTP protocol, but mod_logio attempts to look deeper (and adds additional overhead) to make the best determination that it can. > 2. What exactly does the number after the 206 code in the access_log > mean? Is it simply the range the client _requested_ via the Range > header? In which case, it has no real relationship to how much data was > _actually_ transferred? 206 is no different than 200. In both cases the client might not actually receive the entire requested range. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|