Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL
From: "Steve Swift" <steve.j.swift@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:09:51 +0000
Delivered-to: mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <456C3B11.3020904@xxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <dbd3c1650611280109w1af6d14ft5f90aa8324a5ea42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20061128091431.GA25820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <456C3B11.3020904@xxxxxx>
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks for that, perhaps I'll get a change to use it some time. However, the server in question in this case is inside IBM, and the only common part of its servername across the virtualhosts is ".ibm.com" so I won't rush off to get a certificate for that!

On 28/11/06, Robert Fox <rfox2@xxxxxx> wrote:

You only need a separate IP for every virtual host if you are not using a wildcard certificate. Wildcard certs cost a
little more, but they are good for all hosts within a particular domain. Then, you can run all of your vhosts on port
443 with the same IP, and the cert will work for all of the vhosts.

--
Steve Swift
http://www.swiftys.org.uk

References:
- Virtual Hosts and SSL
  - From: Steve Swift
- Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL
  - From: Frode E. Moe
- Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL
  - From: Robert Fox

Prev by Date: Apache Error with mrtg-rrd
Next by Date: memory comsumption in Apache
Previous by thread: Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL
Next by thread: Re: Virtual Hosts and SSL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]