[users@httpd] CA Secure Proxy Server vs Apache Reverse Proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [users@httpd] CA Secure Proxy Server vs Apache Reverse Proxy
From: "Jack Saunders" <jack.g.saunders@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:17:23 -0400
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Has anyone done any performance comparison between Computer Associates
Secure Proxy Server vs Apache Reverse Proxy regarding proxying content
and the latency added per request.

I am hoping for some hard facts on this to help with a current project that is looking to replace the CA product. From what CA support has stated they add double the latency due to their own custom proxy engine. However I need to really have some good numbers.

Thanks!

Prev by Date: Re: [users@httpd] ldap error configuration error: couldn't check user. No user file?: /
Next by Date: Re: [users@httpd] ldap error configuration error: couldn't check user. No user file?: /
Previous by thread: [users@httpd] ldap error configuration error: couldn't check user. No user file?: /
Next by thread: [users@httpd] "Deadlock" msgs in error_log
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]