Changed the title to be noticed. :-) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Xuekun Hu <xuekun.hu@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mar 10, 2006 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_mem_cache configuration help To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thanks for replying. I tested mod_file_cache. However I also met some errors both with cachefile and mmapfile. When I want to cache more than 20 files, there are the below errors. Using cachefile: [Fri Mar 10 12:56:47 2006] [info] [client 10.0.1.4] (70014)End of file found: core_output_filter: writing data to the network [Fri Mar 10 12:56:47 2006] [info] [client 10.0.1.4] (70014)End of file found: core_output_filter: writing data to the network [Fri Mar 10 12:56:48 2006] [info] [client 10.0.1.3] (70014)End of file found: core_output_filter: writing data to the network ... Using mmapfile: [Fri Mar 10 15:32:03 2006] [info] [client 10.0.0.7] (14)Bad address: core_output_filter: writing data to the network [Fri Mar 10 15:32:03 2006] [info] [client 10.0.0.7] (14)Bad address: core_output_filter: writing data to the network [Fri Mar 10 15:32:03 2006] [info] [client 10.0.1.3] (14)Bad address: core_output_filter: writing data to the network ... While when caching below 10 files, all work fine. It seems mod_file_cache can't cache many files? My configuration is: 4 x Intel Xeon (EM64T) SLES9 SP2 (64bit) Is it a bug? Thx, Xuekun On 2/24/06, Joshua Slive <joshua@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2/23/06, Xuekun Hu <xuekun.hu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to cache some files and don't want them to be removed if the > > cache if full. That's means the cache is serviced as > > first-come-first-service basis. Can I do that by setting > > "CacheDefaultExpire" to a large number? > > > > However I found this sentence "If a new object needs to be inserted in > > the cache and the size of the object is greater than the remaining > > memory, objects will be removed until the new object can be cached. > > The object to be removed is selected using the algorithm specified by > > MCacheRemovalAlgorithm" in docs. So it seems the objects are hard to > > stay in the cache, it has the the chance to be removed out! > > > > Any ideas? Thanks in advance. > > It sounds like you may be looking for mod_file_cache. > > If not, you may also want to consider using mod_disk_cache in place of > mod_mem_cache, because it allows the OS to be in charge of the memory > caching issues (using the OS buffer cache) and hence will often > outperform mod_mem_cache. > > Joshua. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|