Re: [users@httpd] windows binaries... yes, again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

httpd 2.2.0 simply didn't build on win32, well, not without alot of patches.
After the first, then the second, it was looking somewhat promising.  By the
time I was finished, the package had drifted pretty far from the source tarball.
One thing the httpd project

... (getting tired I guess) ...

One thing the httpd project focuses on is the correctness of the source
distribution.  We only ship binaries based on the sources with very minor
corrections to the build, and never really to the source code.  If the source
changes, a new -source- tarball is created first.

Which is exactly what I'm trying to accomplish pushing out 2.2.1, very quickly,
ahead of the Windows installer.

Bill

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux