RE: [users@httpd] Apache reverse and caching proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




As a matter a fact, I'm not interested in the number of requests, but in the size of the request. I'd like the cache to get the header to check if the cached resource is stale based on the last-modified header.

Maybe by combining this strategy with an expiration time of some hours, might even improve performance, such that the cache only checks for the last modified time of the resource every hour or something.




Axel-Stéphane  SMORGRAV <Axel-Stephane.SMORGRAV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

12/01/2006 15:36

Please respond to
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To
<users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
RE: [users@httpd] Apache reverse and caching proxy





How does this work for you: it depends on what you want.

If you want certain URLs to be revalidated with every request, you should follow Joshua's advice and make sure that those resources are served with Cache-Control: must-revalidate. If the source server is an Apache and the resources are static files, you can probably use mod_headers (Header set or Header append) to achieve this. The downside of this strategy is that it makes caching the resource on the reverse proxy more or less pointless.

If you can accept a certain delay between the time where the source is updated and the update becomes effective for the client, playing with CacheDefaultExpires may get you there. The RP cache will be revalidated every time the cache entry becomes stale, and you can determine the interval using CacheDefaultExpires. That will reduce the number of requests that need to be forwarded all the way to the source.

BR
-ascs

________________________________

From: Wim.Van.Leuven@xxxxxx [mailto:Wim.Van.Leuven@xxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:27 PM
To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Apache reverse and caching proxy



Hello Axel-Stéphane,

If I can follow what you are trying to tell me, I should add the "expiresactive on" directive on the source server instead of the caching server?





Axel-Stéphane  SMORGRAV <Axel-Stephane.SMORGRAV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

12/01/2006 15:12
Please respond to
users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux