Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0 or 2.2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 05 January 2006 05:01, Jason Williard wrote:
> I am building a set of web servers that will be running both Apache 1.3.x

... three years obsolete ...

> and a version of the 2.x branches.  My question is quite simple... Which
> version is recommended?  Is the 2.2 branch stable enough and supported
> enough or should I install 2.0 for the time being and upgrade to 2.2 in the
> future?

2.2 is the best-supported version by the developers.  2.0 probably still has
more third-party modules that work out-of-the-box.  But the transition from
2.0 to 2.2 is not difficult, so upgrading a third-party module shouldn't be
more than an hours work for a programmer.  And after the first one - when
you know what to expect - it'll be a five minute job.

-- 
Nick Kew

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux