Hi Axel-Stéphane! Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV wrote:
The same server certificate is presented by both sites and the CN does not match any of the FQDN. Therefore you get a security warning on both URLs. That's what's wrong.
Ok. Up to now I thought the warning is not importent for my purposes...
The requests will always be served by the first (default) NVH which IP address/port matches the VirtualHost definition regardless of ServerName. Therefore, the certificate presented to the client will always be the one defined by CertificatePath or CertificateFile in that particular virtual host.When the requests really are served by the first vhost, why is ronalter's docroot different from grundfunk's?
If you define different log files for each of your named virtual hosts, you will be able to see that for yourself.
I should see nothing in the individual logfile, shouldn't I? But I it's like the following: #tail -f grundfunk_access_log: ----------------------------------------70.228.189.54 - - [04/Jan/2006:18:43:10 +0100] "GET /index.php/Hauptseite HTTP/1.1" 200 2910 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux) KHTML/3.4.0 (like Gecko)"
---------------------------------------- #tail -f ronalter_access_log: ----------------------------------------62.180.225.194 - - [04/Jan/2006:18:52:14 +0100] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 1048 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051010 Firefox/1.0.7 (Ubuntu package 1.0.7)"
---------------------------------------- What can I see from this? many thanks so far... Steffen. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|