|
Hi All, I have made progress with my previous suexec + mod_ldap_user
+ multiple vhosts issue, however I am now getting a strange problem where
suexec is being called when I try accessing a cgi in one vhost but not another: [pid 23260] read(43, "username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx\0$1$2693dd5d$M7PwuqJqWpYiqpHsUyUuZ0\0Not
Available\0/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx\0/bin/default-shell\0", 119) = 119 [pid 23260] close(43) = 0 [pid 23260] stat64("/u", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755,
st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 [pid 23260] stat64("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/filedel.cgi",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=522, ...}) = 0 [pid 23260] open("/u/a/.htaccess", O_RDONLY) = -1
ENOENT (No such file or directory) [pid 23260] open("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/.htaccess",
O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) [pid 23260] open("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/.htaccess",
O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) [pid 23260] open("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/filedel.cgi/.htaccess",
O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOTDIR (Not a directory) [pid 23260] getpid() = 23260 [pid 23260] pipe([43, 44]) = 0 [pid 23260] fcntl64(44, F_GETFL) = 0x1 (flags
O_WRONLY) [pid 23260] fcntl64(44, F_SETFL, O_WRONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 [pid 23260] pipe([45, 46]) = 0 [pid 23260] fcntl64(45, F_GETFL) = 0 (flags O_RDONLY) [pid 23260] fcntl64(45, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 [pid 23260] pipe([47, 48]) = 0 [pid 23260] fcntl64(47, F_GETFL) = 0 (flags O_RDONLY) [pid 23260] fcntl64(47, F_SETFL, O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 0 [pid 23260] fork(Process 23294 attached ) = 23294 [pid 23260] close(43 <unfinished ...> [pid 23294] --- SIGSTOP (Stopped (signal)) @ 0 (0) --- [pid 23260] <... close resumed> ) = 0 [pid 23260] close(46) = 0 [pid 23260] close(48) = 0 [pid 23294] getpid( <unfinished ...> [pid 23260] close(44) = 0 [pid 23260] poll( <unfinished ...> [pid 23294] <... getpid resumed> ) = 23294 [pid 23294] getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=RLIM_INFINITY,
rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0 [pid 23294] close(3) = 0 [pid 23294] close(41) = 0 [pid 23294] close(40) = 0 [pid 23294] close(39) = 0 [pid 23294] close(38) = 0 [pid 23294] close(37) = 0 [pid 23294] close(36) = 0 [pid 23294] close(35) = 0 [pid 23294] close(34) = 0 [pid 23294] close(33) = 0 [pid 23294] close(32) = 0 [pid 23294] close(31) = 0 [pid 23294] close(30) = 0 [pid 23294] close(29) = 0 [pid 23294] close(28) = 0 [pid 23294] close(27) = 0 [pid 23294] close(25) = 0 [pid 23294] close(23) = 0 [pid 23294] close(26) = 0 [pid 23294] close(22) = 0 [pid 23294] close(21) = 0 [pid 23294] close(20) = 0 [pid 23294] close(19) = 0 [pid 23294] close(18) = 0 [pid 23294] close(17) = 0 [pid 23294] close(16) = 0 [pid 23294] close(15) = 0 [pid 23294] close(10) = 0 [pid 23294] close(9) = 0 [pid 23294] close(8) = 0 [pid 23294] close(6) = 0 [pid 23294] close(5) = 0 [pid 23294] close(4) = 0 [pid 23294] close(42) = 0 [pid 23294] close(44) = 0 [pid 23294] dup2(43, 0) = 0 [pid 23294] close(43) = 0 [pid 23294] close(45) = 0 [pid 23294] dup2(46, 1) = 1 [pid 23294] close(46) = 0 [pid 23294] close(47) = 0 [pid 23294] dup2(48, 2) = 2 [pid 23294] close(48) = 0 [pid 23294] rt_sigaction(SIGCHLD, {SIG_DFL}, {SIG_DFL}, 8) =
0 [pid 23294] chdir("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/")
= 0 [pid 23294] getpid() = 23294 [pid 23294] getrlimit(RLIMIT_STACK, {rlim_cur=RLIM_INFINITY,
rlim_max=RLIM_INFINITY}) = 0 [pid 23294] rt_sigaction(SIGRTMIN, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 [pid 23294] rt_sigaction(SIGRT_1, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 [pid 23294] rt_sigaction(SIGRT_2, {SIG_DFL}, NULL, 8) = 0 [pid 23294] execve("/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/filedel.cgi",
["/u/a/username@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/cgi-bin/filedel.cgi"], [/* 20 vars
*/]) = 0 So Apache is now doing a correct lookup for the user (with
the realm appended) and it is getting a correct reply for the home directory,
but then it just does an normal exec instead of using suexec? If I try this with another realm it works (granted the other
realm doesn’t get the @domainname.com appended, however the fact that it
is returning the correct user details says to me that this part of it is ok). I
have diff’ed the 2 vhost config files, but they pretty much look
identical. Does anyone have any ideas why suexec would not be getting
executed? Adam. |
|