RE: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0: Recommended Mutex types for Solaris 8,9,10

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Joe, 

Thanks for replying to my post.

Isn't the AcceptMutex only used inside the parent process to serialise the access to the accept(2) system call ?

Is your comment about cross-process mutex relevant for SSLMutex rather than AcceptMutex , and would that mean that in your opinion although it might be OK to use pthread for AcceptMutex it should be avoided in the case of SSLMutex ?

Would you have any idea of the performance implications of using fcntl or flock over sysvsem or pthread ?

Thanks
-ascs
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Orton [mailto:jorton@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 3:14 PM
To: Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
Cc: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.0: Recommended Mutex types for Solaris 8,9,10

On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:17:38AM +0200, Axel-Stéphane  SMORGRAV wrote:
> As far as I can tell, in Apache versions 2.0.49 and prior the default 
> Mutex type (at least for AcceptMutex) was pthread. It then changed to 
> fcntl around Apache 2.0.50 leading me to post the following
> http://issues.eu.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32325 issue, and 
> explicitly set both mutexes to pthread which appeared to solve the 
> problem.
>
> Several people have since posted similar problems and solved the issue 
> by explicitly setting the mutex types to something other than 
> AcceptMutex default and SSLMutex default.
> 
> Does anyone have any idea of the pros and cons of the different mutex 
> types, provided they are available on any given platform? Is there any 
> reason to use a different mutex implementation for AcceptMutex than 
> you would for SSLMutex? What are the performance and operational 
> issues with each mutex type?

A pthread cross-process mutex is not released if the process holding it segfaults; this can lead to the entire server deadlocking particularly if using a threaded MPM.

I don't think anybody knows what conditions will lead to the fcntl EDEADLK issue on Solaris, that is really a problem which needs more investigation.

(historically, 1.3 always used fnctl on Solaris IIRC, so it is definitely the most "tried and tested")

joe


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux