Joshua Slive wrote on 24.03.2005:
>>I actually do have two complete VirtualHosts (with individual
>>DocumentRoots), but most of my VirtualHosts are indeed incomplete.
>>But shouldn't Apache also complain if I have NameVirtualHost and
>>VirtualHost configured for all IPs/ports if the incomplete
>>VirtualHosts are the problem?
>
>I don't understand this paragraph. But another thing to look for
>with regard to the error messages: You know that you should be using
>only a single NameVirtualHost directive for each IP, and not one per
><VirtualHost>, right?
>
Sorry if I haven't been clear so far. This is where I stand. I get the warning using this
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080>
ServerName testserver
</VirtualHost>
or this
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1>
ServerName testserver
</VirtualHost>
I get no warnings doing this
NameVirtualHost *
<VirtualHost *>
ServerName testserver
</VirtualHost>
If I run httpd -S I get
[Thu Mar 24 22:51:35 2005] [warn] NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080 has no VirtualHosts
VirtualHost configuration:
127.0.0.1:8080 is a NameVirtualHost
default server mysqladmin (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:313)
port 8080 namevhost mysqladmin (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:313)
port 8080 namevhost mysqladmin (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:313)
port 8080 namevhost datenbanken (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:318)
port 8080 namevhost datenbanken (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:318)
port 8080 namevhost briefmaschine (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:328)
port 8080 namevhost briefmaschine (/usr/local/apache2/conf/httpd.conf:328)
Syntax OK
><VirtualHost> sections have no effect at all on what hostnames apache
>listens to. Apache will automatically take requests for all
>hostnames. So if all the names are treated the same, you don't need
>a <VirtualHost> section at all. If you have some "normal" virtual
>hosts that are not subject to the RewriteRules, then you can have a
><VirtualHost> section for each of those, and then a separate
><VirtualHost> section for all the other hosts, where you list a
>single ServerName and all the other names are listed under
>ServerAlias.
Yes, my description was misleading. I though that without the different ServerName directives inside my VirtualHosts, CGI.pm's server_name() method could not distinguish between the various websites the Apache process should act as.
And here is the really embarrassing part: I never thought of turning off UseCanonicalHostname, so the requested hostname gets used automatically.
Anyway, I still need the two (three) VirtualHosts returned by the above test, and "Syntax OK" seems to contradict the warning. This is the VirtualHost section:
NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080>
ServerName mysqladmin
DocumentRoot /Users/jan/Sites/mysqladmin
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080>
ServerName datenbanken
DocumentRoot /Users/jan/Sites/datenbanken
<Directory />
Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI
AllowOverride None
</Directory>
DirectoryIndex index.pl
</VirtualHost>
<VirtualHost 127.0.0.1:8080>
ServerName briefmaschine
DocumentRoot /Users/jan/Sites/briefmaschine
<Directory />
Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI
AllowOverride None
</Directory>
DirectoryIndex brief.pl
</VirtualHost>
Thanks for your helpful hints,
Jan
--
How many Microsoft engineers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None. They just redefine "dark" as the new standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|