On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:18:13 +0100, Boyle Owen <Owen.Boyle@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philippe MARASSE [mailto:philippe@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > > >Did you read the big warning at the top of the documentation? > > >http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/perchild.html > > > > > > > > Yes, and this mpm may not go better if no one wants to test > > it, isn't it ? > > I think the point is that the module is not in *use*. It is in > *development*. Therefore, this *user* list is not the correct forum to > discuss any development you want to do. Yes, and the fact that there is really no use in testing it if you do not have the coding skills to identify exactly what is wrong and suggest how to fix it. The developers already know it doesn't work, so there is no point in telling them that. As the docs say, don't use it unless you have the skills to help fix it. In reality, perchild is completely dead at this point. A project that seems more lively and is working towards a simular goal is the metux mpm: http://nibiru.borg.metux.de:7000/wiki.mpm/ Joshua. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|