[users@httpd] sticky bit , apache 1.x and apache 2.x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [users@httpd] sticky bit , apache 1.x and apache 2.x
From: Tuan Quan <tuan_quan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:51:57 -0800 (PST)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: apmail-httpd-users-archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mailing-list: contact users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I am running Apache 2.0.52 on Solaris 9.

I like to run a cgi program, but with root permission (the httpd first starts as root, but then run all httpds as www user)

I tried to chmod u+s mycgi (the name of my cgi program)

make it owned by root.

but the cgi did not run as root.

Is Apache 2.x compiled with this option disabled?

Is there way to get around this?

How about Apache 1.x?

thanks.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [users@httpd] sticky bit , apache 1.x and apache 2.x
  - From: Joshua Slive

Prev by Date: Re: httpd 2.0.53 processes don't die
Next by Date: [users@httpd] apache + asp?
Next by thread: Re: [users@httpd] sticky bit , apache 1.x and apache 2.x
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]