Hello everyone, After fighting the tests, I can confirm that the issue is certificates are not being verified correctly. For example, for t/protocol/echo.t, I was able to make it pass by updating vhost_socket in TestRequest.pm by bypassing cert verification: Index: httpd-2.4.58/httpd-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRequest.pm =================================================================== --- httpd-2.4.58.orig/httpd-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRequest.pm +++ httpd-2.4.58/httpd-framework/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestRequest.pm @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ use constant UA_TIMEOUT => 60 * 10; #lon my $have_lwp = 0; +use IO::Socket::SSL; + # APACHE_TEST_PRETEND_NO_LWP=1 pretends that LWP is not available so # one can test whether the test suite survives if the user doesn't # have lwp installed @@ -296,7 +298,15 @@ sub vhost_socket { require IO::Socket::SSL; # Add all conn_opts to args map {$args{$_} = $conn_opts->{$_}} keys %{$conn_opts}; - return IO::Socket::SSL->new(%args, Timeout => UA_TIMEOUT); + + my $sock = IO::Socket::SSL->new( + %args, + Timeout => UA_TIMEOUT, + SSL_verify_mode => SSL_VERIFY_NONE, + ) or die "failed connect or ssl handshake: $!, $SSL_ERROR"; + + return $sock + } else { require IO::Socket; Of course, this is not the way to move forward, as I understand all cert verification should work. My guess is that in TestSSLCA.pm, when all certificates are generated, we are missing some option and/or tweaks. Unfortunately I'm not a security expert and I would like someone with more knowledge to look into this, if possible. Basically, all tests fail with a similar trace as this one: ssl_engine_kernel.c(2213): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: Loop: SSLv3/TLS write finished ssl_engine_kernel.c(2213): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: Loop: TLSv1.3 early data ssl_engine_io.c(2401): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: read 5/5 bytes from BIO#7fb2a40045c0 [mem: 7fb2a401c523] (BIO dump follows) ssl_engine_io.c(2331): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ssl_engine_io.c(2368): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] | 0000: 15 03 03 00 02 ..... | ssl_engine_io.c(2373): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ssl_engine_io.c(2401): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: read 2/2 bytes from BIO#7fb2a40045c0 [mem: 7fb2a401c528] (BIO dump follows) ssl_engine_io.c(2331): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ssl_engine_io.c(2368): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] | 0000: 02 30 .0 | ssl_engine_io.c(2373): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ssl_engine_kernel.c(2218): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: Read: TLSv1.3 early data ssl_engine_kernel.c(2242): [client 127.0.0.1:33114] OpenSSL: Exit: error in error [client 127.0.0.1:33114] AH02008: SSL library error 1 in handshake (server laptop:8532) SSL Library Error: error:0A000418:SSL routines::tlsv1 alert unknown ca (SSL alert number 48) [client 127.0.0.1:33114] AH01998: Connection closed to child 9 with abortive shutdown (server laptop:8532) The key here is the "unknown ca", failing the handshake, either because the trust chain is broken somehow or the certs need to be generated now in a different way with OpenSSL 3.2. Any idea to move forward? Cheers, David. On 25/01/2024 13:54, David Anes wrote:
Hello all,I've successfully compiled apache 2.4.58 against OpenSSL 3.2, but I see lot's of issues when running the test suite.My first guess are the changes in 3.2 regarding the way certificates are generated (from the changelog at https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/openssl-3.2.0/NEWS.md):* The x509, ca, and req apps now always produce X.509v3 certificates. Also, other potential incompatible issues metioned there are: * The default SSL/TLS security level has been changed from 1 to 2.* Subject or issuer names in X.509 objects are now displayed as UTF-8 strings by default.I've tried compiling normally, as prefork and event but all of them fail the same way:Test Summary Report -------------------t/protocol/echo.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)Failed test: 1 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 8 tests but ran 1. t/security/CVE-2005-2700.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1t/security/CVE-2009-3555.t (Wstat: 65280 (exited 255) Tests: 1 Failed: 1)Failed test: 1 Non-zero exit status: 255 Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 1. t/ssl/basicauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 2-3 t/ssl/env.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 30 Failed: 23) Failed tests: 1-8, 16-30 t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/ssl/fakeauth.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 2) Failed tests: 2-3 t/ssl/headers.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 1-3 t/ssl/ocsp.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 1-3 t/ssl/pr12355.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 10) Failed tests: 1-10 t/ssl/pr43738.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 4) Failed tests: 1-4 t/ssl/proxy.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 290 Failed: 290) Failed tests: 1-290 t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 5) Failed tests: 2, 5-7, 9 t/ssl/varlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 81 Failed: 81) Failed tests: 1-81 t/ssl/verify.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2Files=142, Tests=7248, 132 wallclock secs ( 3.04 usr 0.50 sys + 50.18 cusr 28.03 csys = 81.75 CPU)Result: FAIL Failed 15/142 test programs. 431/7248 subtests failed. Any clue? Does anyone had success running the tests against OpenSSL 3.2? Thanks, David.
-- David Anes <david.anes@xxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature