Hello List,separatly from other mail with proxy_fcgi/enablereuse problem i want to tell about my results. This is quite interesting.
System is Ubuntu16.04, libnghttp2-14 1.7.1, Apache 2.4.29, php 7.0.25All tests were startet with this params: h2load -n100000 -c100 -m10 https://example.com/infophp.php
Tests used for this example were 100% successful:requests: 100000 total, 100000 started, 100000 done, 100000 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 errored, 0 timeout I run 10 Tests for every configuration, i just write here one significant result as example.
First test is mod_php with mpm_prefork finished in 42.87s, 2332.39 req/s, 253.63MB/s load average: 47,692nd test is php-fpm with classic mod_fastcgi configuration using FastCGIExternalServer
finished in 51.28s, 1950.25 req/s, 227.16MB/s load average: 60,703rd test is php-fpm using fcgi_proxy configuration (unixsocket/enablereuse=off) and mpm_event
finished in 47.54s, 2103.41 req/s, 225.35MB/s load average: 61,50I expected that fcgi_proxy/mpm_event is quicker then mod_fastcgi, but i never expected that my winner in this test is mod_php. also there was lowest loadavg. This is especially remarkable because i use unofficial patch to activate http2 with mpm prefork along with "H2MaxWorkers 1" to avoid segfaults. Version 2.4.27 dropped support for http2 when using mpm_prefork through performance-probs reported by users.
http://httpd.markmail.org/search/?q=Apache%20HTTP%20Server%202.4.27%20Released#query:Apache%20HTTP%20Server%202.4.27%20Released+page:1+mid:nsnewcr74hg6527f+state:resultsI wonder why my test showed this result. May be mass-requesting of phpinfo is not comparable with a real production-server but altogether iam surprised.
How to understand this result ? Thanks, Hajo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|