Re: 2.4 named virtual hosts question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 2.4 named virtual hosts question
- From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 19:00:39 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CALK=YjMF99-hnmKjm9qaKWg-AjvpRaCDxB2jx73zd5Hq7SaBWA@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>The first one will always be a default. You can make a dedicated one for it.
Thank you. I appreciate your timely reply, however I think that maybe
you didn't quite get my point and/or my question.
I simply do not want there to exist a default vhost, period.
Isn't there any magic directive like "SetDefaultVhost none" or some
such thing like that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[Index of Archives]
[Open SSH Users]
[Linux ACPI]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux Laptop]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Squid]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]