With RPM, you don't ever want to modify the upstream source archive (instead you use patches or an external SPEC). Rather than rebuilding the tarball and putting your SPEC inside it, you should be keeping the SPEC separate and using -bb or -ba (for a source RPM) argument to rpmbuild. Rick Houser Web Administration > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Bell [mailto:kenbell@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 02:19 > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: mod_proxy_fdpass.so file missing > > This is on CentOS 6.8, but the error you show was the same. > > To try to build the package I edited the httpd.spec file to add: > "--enable-proxy" and "--enable-proxy-fdpass" to the "%configure" > stanza. That got rid of the error you show but turned up a different > one: "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found" regarding > "/usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_proxy_hcheck.so". I then added that > file to the list of modules, recreated the "httpd-2.4.23.tar.bz" > file and apparently successfully built the RPMs. > > Ken > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2016 03:15:27 GMT kohmoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > During rpmbuild using httpd-2.4.23.tar.bz2, error message tells me > > mod_proxy_fdpass.so is missing. This httpd-2.4.23.tar.bz2 was downloaded > > from http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 at 12:00 JST on 7/14. > > > > Therefore, no httpd-2.4.20-1.x86_64.rpm is obtained. > > It would be helpful httpd-2.4.23.tar.bz2 without error during rpmbuild > > could be downloaded. > > > > CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 > > kernel 3.10.0-327.22.2.el7.x86_64 > > -- > Ken Bell :: kenbell_AT_panix_DOT_com :: 212-475-4976 (voice) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|