Re: Second apache as fallback server

[Bob <bobnlinux@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello John,

Could you please give me some more clue / pointers/ link ?

Please allow me repeating my questions again

What can be done to assure the high-availability of the reverse proxy itself ?
What about the latency if the master and hot standby located in two different data center ?

On Monday 15 February 2016 09:02 AM, Meta Correio wrote:

We have it implemented using and external, redundant , load balancer.

It really comes down to your budget.

John

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Bob <bobnlinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for the valuable suggestions.

What can be done to assure the high-availability of the reverse proxy itself ?
What about the latency if the master and hot standby located in two different data center ?

On Sunday 14 February 2016 10:43 PM, Yehuda Katz wrote:

We use three different methods:
1. Content on NFS server
2. Content auto-committing and auto-pulling over git about every 15 minutes
3. Separate database server - with replication for backup.

- Y

Sent from a device with a very small keyboard and hyperactive autocorrect.

On Feb 14, 2016 5:28 PM, "Rose, John B" <jbrose@xxxxxxx> wrote:

What is your preferred approach to keeping content in sync?

Sent from my iPad

On Feb 14, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Daniel <dferradal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

with a reverse proxy in front of both, you use balancer setup specifying the second web server as hot standby

El dom., 14 feb. 2016 a las 16:49, Bob (<bobnlinux@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió:

Hello list,

I have two servers. One is already up with apache, mysql etc..
Now I wonder if I can configure the second server as a fallback web server.
The idea is.. if first web server is down , the second one will serve
the requests.

Any suggestion / idea is very much welcome.

Thanks and regards,
Bob

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx