On 01/11/2016 04:51 PM, Rose, John B wrote: > After switching to mod_php from php-fpm we are told the site is working > 4x faster using mod_php instead of php-fpm. > > Any explanation? The cynic in me things that this is a case of old dogs being unwilling to learn new tricks. Other things that come to mind is that fpm is grossly misconfigured - perhaps they allocated insufficient memory to it? Or are running it on another machine that has a faulty network connection between them? Or possibly the server pool is smaller than Apache's server pool, causing too much thrashing. (See the pm.min_spare_servers and so on) > Thanks > > From: William A Rowe Jr <wrowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wrowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Reply-To: "users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" > <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Date: Saturday, January 9, 2016 1:58 PM > To: "users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" > <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > Subject: Re: Circumstances when mod_php would run faster > than PHP-FPM? > > Mod_proxy_fcgi + php-fpm or mod_fcgid with php fcgi sapi should both be > equivalent when tuned correctly. > > Your only option for running php in process efficiently is to use the > non-threadsafe php in the httpd preform module. Your only option for > running httpd efficiently is the event, or at least the worker mpm. > > Since usually only a subset of the http requests are to a php resource, > the answer is almost always 'no'. > > On Jan 8, 2016 16:48, "Rose, John B" <jbrose@xxxxxxx > <mailto:jbrose@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Apache 2.4 > > On the same system, same web site, are there circumstances when > Apache using mod_php would run faster than Apache using PHP-FPM? > > Thanks > -- Rich Bowen - rbowen@xxxxxxxxxxx - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|