Thanks, Kurtis, for the hint, I just did not observe this.... suomi On 10/18/2015 04:56 PM, Kurtis Rader wrote:
Why are you asking the users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mailing list this question? This mailing
list is for questions about using the Apache HTTP web server. No one
reading this mailing list is going to help you with a Fedora OS problem.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 4:44 AM, fedora <fedora@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:fedora@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi listers
I have a workstation with two disks:
[root@casablanca ~]# parted -l
Model: ATA WDC WD20EFRX-68E (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition Table: gpt
Disk Flags: pmbr_boot
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 20.5kB 262MB 262MB BIOS boot partition
bios_grub
2 262MB 21.7GB 21.5GB ext4 Linux filesystem
3 21.7GB 32.5GB 10.7GB swsusp Linux swap
4 32.5GB 870GB 838GB ext4 Linux filesystem
5 870GB 900GB 30.0GB ext4 Linux filesystem
6 900GB 2000GB 1100GB btrfs
Model: ATA WDC WD10EADS-00L (scsi)
Disk /dev/sdb: 1000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 52.4GB 52.4GB primary xfs boot
2 52.4GB 61.1GB 8703MB primary linux-swap(v1)
3 61.1GB 1000GB 939GB primary xfs
[root@casablanca ~]#
NOTE: the first disk has got a gpt partition table and a BIOS boot
partition, the second has got an msdos partition table.
Both disks have got fedora 22 installed. They can run independently
from one another.
----------
Just now, I did an update
dnf update
...
...
...
on both disks. I rebooted both disks.
The result on the first disk (with gpt partition table) is this:
[root@thunder ~]# uname -r
4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
[root@thunder ~]#
[root@thunder ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64 2.6.1-2.fc22 @System
kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.1.4-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.4-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.1.4-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel-devel.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
kernel-headers.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
kernel-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
kernel.x86_64 4.1.6-200.fc22 @System
kernel.x86_64 4.1.6-201.fc22 @System
kernel.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @System
libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64 2.6.2-1.fc22 @System
[root@thunder ~]#
Apparently, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64 is not installed, but
the machine according to uname -r
booted from it?????
------
The result on the second disk (with msdos partition table) is this:
[root@casablanca ~]# uname -r
4.2.3-200.fc22.x86_64
[root@casablanca ~]#
[root@casablanca ~]# dnf list installed |grep kernel |sort
abrt-addon-kerneloops.x86_64 2.6.1-5.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-core.x86_64 @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-core.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules-extra.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-debug-modules.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-devel.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-headers.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel-modules.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64 4.1.7-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64 4.1.8-200.fc22 @updates
kernel.x86_64 4.2.3-200.fc22 @updates
libreport-plugin-kerneloops.x86_64 2.6.2-4.fc22 @updates
[root@casablanca ~]#
Here, the kernel 4.2.3-200.fc22 is installed and the machine
according to uname -r booted from it.
---------
Does the BIOS boot partition make the difference? Can anybody
explain this strange behaviour?
Thanks for your attention.
suomi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Kurtis Rader
Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|