Re: SSI best practice: XbitHack or .shtml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SSI best practice: XbitHack or .shtml
From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 17:14:51 -0500
In-reply-to: <CAFMGiz8auTTgOVP1T9Lu2L9bTdOHtahLx6jOAhZiDjAhHKAZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Aug 25, 2015 5:10 AM, "Tom Browder" <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone have an opinion of the best way to indicate an SSI file to be
> scanned?

Ping, anyone?

-Tom

References:
- SSI best practice: XbitHack or .shtml
  - From: Tom Browder

Prev by Date: Implementing flush() during PUT (Hadoop WebHDFS)
Next by Date: SSLProxyMachineCertificatePath certificate selection
Previous by thread: SSI best practice: XbitHack or .shtml
Next by thread: CGI Error with Readonly Database
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux