So if we are using 2.2 Apache then we could move to "worker" mpm with php-fpm. At the moment we wanted to fix this Wordpress/change owner issue quickly. To users wanting to use point and click tools to load images, themes and plugins etc in Wordpress and concerned about file ownership it is a necessity. Plus we cannot monitor their quotas. So my question is, while using prefork and php-fpm isn't ideally efficient, it isn't a problem if we use prefork and php-fpm. That won't break anything? Thanks On 8/12/15 12:41 PM, "Rich Bowen" <rbowen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >On 08/11/2015 12:43 PM, Rose, John B wrote: >> We are using Apache 2.2, so we are using prefork. >> >> So no problems using PHp-fpm and prefork on Apache 2.2? > >php-fpm is a separate service from apache httpd. Requests are proxied >from Apache httpd to php-fpm. So while it doesn't matter which MPM >you're running on the front-end server (or, indeed, if you're running >Apache httpd at all), we do rather strongly recommend that you 1) >upgrade to 2.4 if at all possible, and 2) don't use prefork unless >there's some compelling reason to do so. In the old days, the compelling >reason to use prefork was that you were using it in conjunction with >mod_php, which had possible threading problems (to oversimplify). If >you're using php-fpm instead of using mod_php, then there's really no >reason any more to use prefork. > > >-- >Rich Bowen - rbowen@xxxxxxxxxxx - @rbowen >http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|