Re: what's the minimum version of openssl required by 2.2.29? (Apache Users)

2015-02-05 18:42 GMT+01:00 Shane Witbeck <shane.witbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

I recently upgraded apache from 2.2.27 to 2.2.29 and received the
following error on startup:

/usr/lib64/libcrypto.so.10: no version information available

After some searching, I determined that openssl needed to be upgraded.

On CentOS 6.1 (yes, I know it¹s old):

The previous version was: OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010

After upgrading via Œyum install openssl¹, the new version is: OpenSSL
1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013

This leads me to the question: What¹s the minimum version required by
Apache 2.2.29?

Thanks,
Shane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello

none!

You don't specify if you upgraded through your distribution, or compiled manually, in any case httpd will depend on openssl libraries to which it was compiled, if none were specified it should be using the libraries present in the system when you ran ./configure.

If you upgraded with a distribution upgrade it is hard to believe dependencies are not met or there are library versions mismatches.

It looks to me as if you are installing different packages from different sources.

So I believe it is better if you focus on meeting your distribution dependencies, or if you compiled manually with an external openssl version to add the /path/to/openssl/lib to your libpath or in envvars so httpd will find the appropiate openssl libraries

Daniel Ferradal

IT Specialist

email dferradal@xxxxxxxxx

linkedin es.linkedin.com/in/danielferradal