Re: Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath
From: dE <de.techno@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 19:26:37 +0530
In-reply-to: <CALK=YjPFpRt1gOKHDt84tC7zhWr50w0vW1aO2gn-yeJtrb7cGg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.8.0

On 10/08/14 16:53, Eric Covener wrote:

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 6:46 AM, dE <de.techno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Are all SSLCA* directives used for the same purpose (where client sends the public key for it's authentication)?

No.

Thanks for clarifying that.

References:
- Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath
  - From: dE
- Re: Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath
  - From: Eric Covener

Prev by Date: Re: Cannot get certificate chain to work.
Next by Date: Re: Cannot get certificate chain to work.
Previous by thread: Re: Intended use of SSLCACertificateFile/SSLCACertificatePath
Next by thread: Memory allocation request exceeded 65,000 bytes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux