Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:55:47PM -0600, Eric Covener wrote:
> 
> Latest GA RHEL,  SLES, and LTS ubuntu don't yet include it
> 
Likely because they don't want to put their users through
configuration hell.

I think the apache folks are assuming that these upgrades are simple.
But from what I can see, most people are using recipes for their
configurations--that's certainly what I do--because the configuration
is too complicated as it is. Upgrading means breakage.

And even if you fight your way through the configuration upgrade, if
you run into other problems, as I have, it seems like you're on your
own.

I may very well be forced to abandon this project because I simply
don't know how to fix what's wrong. (See my other pending thread.)

-- 
David Benfell <benfell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the
attachment.

Attachment: pgpXN0X0cKxmb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux