Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
From: John McIntyre <joh98.mac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:35:57 +0100
In-reply-to: <CALK=YjOJ2pmX3erwvO3CTd_JW1UDS8BKX8TCSZO_nhw2kujsKw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Le 1 octobre 2013 à 22:25, Eric Covener a écrit :

Don't use domains or IP addresses inside <virtualhost> or
NameVirtualHost. It's causing two sets of name-based vhosts. Use
*:80.

Hi,

When I did that, and restarted the server and then went to my URL, I got a warning about the certificate not being approved or whatever (the same one I used to get when I was testing the domain with a self-signed certificate). And domain2.com still didn't work.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: Eric Covener

References:
- Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: John McIntyre
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: Pete Houston
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: Nick Tkach
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: John McIntyre
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: Nick Tkach
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: John McIntyre
- Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
  - From: Eric Covener

Prev by Date: Re: AuthType Digest or AuthType Basic not workin in Apache 2.4.6
Next by Date: Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
Previous by thread: Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
Next by thread: Re: Virtual Hosts Possible for SSL ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Open SSH Users] [Linux ACPI] [Linux Kernel] [Linux Laptop] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Squid] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]