I think what Eric is getting at is that the Apache Foundation doesn't provide any *official* win32 binaries - the ones that are available for download are actually ones done by a community member and then merely hosted on the foundations website. Presumably the lack of 2.4 binaries is because whoever was doing them has stopped? Either way, that is why it isn't a policy change - there never have been official ones (god knows why not), just some kindly soul compiling and uploading them for us :-) Hope that helps >I can only say that this doesn't answer the question either. If it isn't a policy change, what kind of a change is it? What is the explanation for the change? After a history of >downloading versions from the httpd.apache.org site for nearly a decade. > >Please note that this is a *question.* All previous queries on this topic seem to me to have been summarily dismissed as irrelevant complaints. A proper answer seems merited. > >EJP > >-----Original Message----- >From: Eric Covener [mailto:covener@xxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2012 10:58 PM >To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: Apache HTTP Server 2.4.x for Windows? > >On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@xxxxxxxxxxx> >wrote: >> Thanks but that doesn't answer my question. I asked: 'is this a policy >> change?' > >No. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|