I have a new installation, RHEL 6 Linux running Apache HTTPD v2.2.15, with *as far as I can tell* the same highly customized configuration (differences have mostly to do with different host names, IP addresses, and paths to files, directories, etc.). It delivers the same files with the extension ".ram" with an undesired Content-Type: text/html, which seems to be due to the DefaultType text/html present in the configurations (both of them). The equivalent TypesConfig specified file on this machine has the same "audio/x-pn-realaudio ram ra" specification as the Solaris version.
Clearly there's SOMETHING different in the configurations, because if we take the SAME HTTPD on the same RHEL 6 installation but use a plain, vanilla, out of the box configuration, it delivers the desired Content-Type correctly, so it's not some difference between HTTPD versions.
But finding the difference needle in the configuration haystack has baffled me so far. I'd happily crank up the LogLevel, for example, if I thought it would get me somewhere. Is there any way to expose the inner musings of the way HTTPD makes its Content-Type determination, like there is for example with a RewriteLogLevel 9 for debugging Rewrite Rules, in Apache HTTPD v2.2.15 ?
I'll note I even put in the following, to no avail: <FilesMatch "^/(.*).ram$"> ForceType audio/x-pn-realaudio </FilesMatch> -- J.Lance Wilkinson ("Lance") InterNet: Lance.Wilkinson@xxxxxxx Systems Design Specialist - Lead Phone: (814) 865-4870 Digital Library Technologies FAX: (814) 863-3560 E3 Paterno Library Penn State University University Park, PA 16802 http://ucs.psu.edu/home/jlw12@xxxxxxx?fmt=freebusy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx