On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In your example it checks in the virtual hosts matching ip:port in >> config file order : >> >> 1. ServerName www.example.com >> >> 2. ServerName gone.example.com >> >> 3. ServerName forbidden.example.com >> ServerAlias *.example.com >> >> The wildcard is last in your example, in mine it is first. Is it as >> simple as changing the order so more specific non-wildcard servernames >> match first and the wildcard last ? Bummer :) > > I'm not sure about wildcard serverlias in first-listed vhost. It's > _already_ the default for anything that doesn't match another > serveralias or servername, so you may be covering up subsequent > specific serveraliases with this wildcard serveralias. Does that > maybe explain the symptom? I think so. This is a paradigm shift for people using NameVirtualHost a.b.c.d and taking advantage of the old "default" per-ip container for virtualhost patterns matching a.b.c.d. on the same port. The wildcard in the first container is what is causing the problem for me. Likewise i think i could simulate multiple "default" sections in apache 2.4 by having the "default" section i have with the wildcard, but with a wildcard serveralias after all the higher priority ServerNames in that group of vhosts, so that the behavior is similar to the old 2.2 notion of NameVirtualHost. > I don't think we'll work hard to find a "better" serveralias but I > have never looked at that part of the resolution. It would be nice to > document that final part. Yes i'd agree that there is no need for a code change, a doco change would solve the problem. Once people using NameVirtualHost start moving to 2.4 on masse, it might pop up more often. Cheers Brett -- The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education. Albert Einstein --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|