On Tuesday, March 13, 2012 10:25:54 AM, Tom Evans wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 5:19 PM, William Taylor > <williamt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I wouldn't say it's silly, but definitely not the norm and obviously a >> low priority >> for everyone else. > > > I would say that forking an entire new process to handle a single > request and then exiting could possibly be the most silly way to serve > http. > > I also understand that sometimes we have to do things that are silly. > > Is your module mainly a content generator? Could your module run as a CGI? > It's unfortunate that it has to work this way but forks are pretty cheap these days. No it doesn't generate content. It can't run as a CGI. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|