On Fri, 03 Nov 2023, Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> sparse static analysis tools generate a warning with this message
> "Using plain integer as NULL pointer". In this case this warning is
> being shown because we are trying to intialize a pointer to NULL using
> integer value 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/clearstate_evergreen.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/clearstate_evergreen.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/clearstate_evergreen.h
> index 63a1ffbb3ced..3b645558f133 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/clearstate_evergreen.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/clearstate_evergreen.h
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ static const struct cs_extent_def SECT_CONTEXT_defs[] =
> {SECT_CONTEXT_def_5, 0x0000a29e, 5 },
> {SECT_CONTEXT_def_6, 0x0000a2a5, 56 },
> {SECT_CONTEXT_def_7, 0x0000a2de, 290 },
> - { 0, 0, 0 }
> + { NULL, 0, 0 }
Random drive-by comment:
I'd just use {} as the sentinel.
BR,
Jani.
> };
> static const u32 SECT_CLEAR_def_1[] =
> {
> @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ static const u32 SECT_CLEAR_def_1[] =
> static const struct cs_extent_def SECT_CLEAR_defs[] =
> {
> {SECT_CLEAR_def_1, 0x0000ffc0, 3 },
> - { 0, 0, 0 }
> + { NULL, 0, 0 }
> };
> static const u32 SECT_CTRLCONST_def_1[] =
> {
> @@ -1070,11 +1070,11 @@ static const u32 SECT_CTRLCONST_def_1[] =
> static const struct cs_extent_def SECT_CTRLCONST_defs[] =
> {
> {SECT_CTRLCONST_def_1, 0x0000f3fc, 2 },
> - { 0, 0, 0 }
> + { NULL, 0, 0 }
> };
> static const struct cs_section_def evergreen_cs_data[] = {
> { SECT_CONTEXT_defs, SECT_CONTEXT },
> { SECT_CLEAR_defs, SECT_CLEAR },
> { SECT_CTRLCONST_defs, SECT_CTRLCONST },
> - { 0, SECT_NONE }
> + { NULL, SECT_NONE }
> };
> --
> 2.39.2
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
