Re: [PATCH libdrm v2] amdgpu: Use PRI?64 to format uint64_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 21.08.23 um 11:14 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
Hi Christian,

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 9:36 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:06 PM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Am 06.07.23 um 10:36 schrieb Geert Uytterhoeven:
On 32-bit:

      ../tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_stress.c: In function ‘alloc_bo’:
      ../tests/amdgpu/amdgpu_stress.c:178:49: warning: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 4 has type ‘uint64_t’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} [-Wformat=]
        fprintf(stdout, "Allocated BO number %u at 0x%lx, domain 0x%x, size %lu\n",
                                                     ~~^
                                                     %llx
         num_buffers++, addr, domain, size);
                        ~~~~
[...]

Fix this by using the proper "PRI?64" format specifiers.

Fixes: d77ccdf3ba6f5a39 ("amdgpu: add amdgpu_stress utility v2")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Well generally good patch, but libdrm changes are now reviewed by merge
request and not on the mailing list any more.
I heard such a rumor, too ;-)

Unfortunately one year later, that process is still not documented in
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/-/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst
which still instructs me (a casual drive-by developer) to just submit
my patches to the mailing list...
So a few weeks ago I created gitlab PRs for all my pending libdrm
patch series, and I rebased them regularly when needed.
What needs to be done to get them merged?

You need to ping the userspace maintainers for this. Like Marek, Pierre-Eric etc..

Regards,
Christian.


Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                         Geert





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux