Fixes the following category of checkpatch warning:
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
+ * non-boosted one. */
WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24)
+ if ((adev->asic_type >= CHIP_POLARIS10) &&
[...]
+ return true;
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@xxxxxxx>
---
.../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
index 75284e2cec74..7c4331313697 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_pp_smu.c
@@ -334,7 +334,8 @@ bool dm_pp_get_clock_levels_by_type(
if (dc_clks->clocks_in_khz[i] > validation_clks.engine_max_clock) {
/* This clock is higher the validation clock.
* Than means the previous one is the highest
- * non-boosted one. */
+ * non-boosted one.
+ */
DRM_INFO("DM_PPLIB: reducing engine clock level from %d to %d\n",
dc_clks->num_levels, i);
dc_clks->num_levels = i > 0 ? i : 1;
@@ -406,10 +407,10 @@ bool dm_pp_notify_wm_clock_changes(
* TODO: expand this to other ASICs
*/
if ((adev->asic_type >= CHIP_POLARIS10) &&
- (adev->asic_type <= CHIP_VEGAM) &&
- !amdgpu_dpm_set_watermarks_for_clocks_ranges(adev,
- (void *)wm_with_clock_ranges))
- return true;
+ (adev->asic_type <= CHIP_VEGAM) &&
+ !amdgpu_dpm_set_watermarks_for_clocks_ranges(adev,
+ (void *)wm_with_clock_ranges))
+ return true;
return false;
}
--
2.25.1
