Hi,
On 2023/6/9 03:07, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Capitalize subject to match ("Tidy ...")
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 07:43:19PM +0800, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch replaces the leading space with a tab and removes the double
blank line, no functional change.
Can you move this to the end of the series? The functional changes
are more likely to be backported, and I think the backport may be a
little easier without the cleanup in the middle.
OK, acceptable.
/* we could in theory hand out locks on IO and mem
- * separately to userspace but it can cause deadlocks */
+ * separately to userspace but it can cause deadlocks
+ */
Since you're touching this anyway, can you update it to the
conventional multi-line comment style:
/*
* We could in theory ...
*/
And capitalize "We", add a period at end, and rewrap to fill 78
columns or so? Same for other comments below.
OK, I could improve this at next version.
+++ b/include/linux/vgaarb.h
@@ -23,9 +23,7 @@
* THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
* LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING
* FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
- * DEALINGS
- * IN THE SOFTWARE.
- *
+ * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
*/
Can you make a separate patch to replace this entire copyright notice
with the appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier header?
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst has details.
Wow ...
Bjorn
--
Jingfeng
