On 3/22/2023 00:48, Wenyou Yang wrote:
When the CPU SMT status change in the fly, sent the SMT-enable
message to pmfw to notify it that the SMT status changed.
Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <WenYou.Yang@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 5 +++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
index b5d64749990e..5cd85a9d149d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
#define SWSMU_CODE_LAYER_L1
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
@@ -69,6 +70,14 @@ static int smu_set_fan_speed_rpm(void *handle, uint32_t speed);
static int smu_set_gfx_cgpg(struct smu_context *smu, bool enabled);
static int smu_set_mp1_state(void *handle, enum pp_mp1_state mp1_state);
+static int smt_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data);
+
+extern struct raw_notifier_head smt_notifier_head;
+
+static struct notifier_block smt_notifier = {
+ .notifier_call = smt_notifier_callback,
+};
+
static int smu_sys_get_pp_feature_mask(void *handle,
char *buf)
{
@@ -625,6 +634,8 @@ static int smu_set_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
return 0;
}
+static struct smu_context *current_smu;
+
static int smu_early_init(void *handle)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
@@ -645,6 +656,7 @@ static int smu_early_init(void *handle)
mutex_init(&smu->message_lock);
adev->powerplay.pp_handle = smu;
+ current_smu = smu;
adev->powerplay.pp_funcs = &swsmu_pm_funcs;
r = smu_set_funcs(adev);
@@ -1105,6 +1117,8 @@ static int smu_sw_init(void *handle)
if (!smu->ppt_funcs->get_fan_control_mode)
smu->adev->pm.no_fan = true;
+ raw_notifier_chain_register(&smt_notifier_head, &smt_notifier);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1122,6 +1136,8 @@ static int smu_sw_fini(void *handle)
smu_fini_microcode(smu);
+ raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&smt_notifier_head, &smt_notifier);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -3241,3 +3257,28 @@ int smu_send_hbm_bad_channel_flag(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t size)
return ret;
}
+
+static int smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(struct smu_context *smu, bool enable)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+ if (smu->ppt_funcs && smu->ppt_funcs->set_cpu_smt_enable)
+ ret = smu->ppt_funcs->set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, enable);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int smt_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long action, void *data)
+{
+ struct smu_context *smu = current_smu;
+ int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
This initialization is pointless, it's clobbered in the next line.
+
+ ret = (action == SMT_ENABLED) ?
+ smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, true) :
+ smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, false);
How about this instead, it should be more readable:
ret = smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, action == SMT_ENABLED);
+ if (ret)
+ ret = NOTIFY_BAD;
+
+ return ret;
How about instead:
dev_dbg(adev->dev, "failed to %sable SMT: %d\n", action == SMT_ENABLED
? "en" : "dis", ret);
return ret ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_OK;
+}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
index 09469c750a96..7c6594bba796 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
@@ -1354,6 +1354,11 @@ struct pptable_funcs {
* @init_pptable_microcode: Prepare the pptable microcode to upload via PSP
*/
int (*init_pptable_microcode)(struct smu_context *smu);
+
+ /**
+ * @set_cpu_smt_enable: Set the CPU SMT status
+ */
+ int (*set_cpu_smt_enable)(struct smu_context *smu, bool enable);
};
typedef enum {
