On 2023-02-28 14:13, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 2/28/23 09:33, Christian König wrote: >> This adds the infrastructure for an execution context for GEM buffers >> which is similar to the existinc TTMs execbuf util and intended to replace > > "existing" > >> it in the long term. >> >> The basic functionality is that we abstracts the necessary loop to lock >> many different GEM buffers with automated deadlock and duplicate handling. >> >> v2: drop xarray and use dynamic resized array instead, the locking >> overhead is unecessary and measureable. > > "unecessary", "measurable" "unnecessary". -- Regards, Luben
