Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: try allowed domain when pin framebuffer failed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:10 PM Zhang, Yifan <Yifan1.Zhang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> We need to adjust the AMDGPU_SG_THRESHOLD as well since recent APUs are configured w/ 512MB VRAM. Pls check attached patch.

Why do we need to increase this threshold?  The condition only applies
to CZ and ST, not more recent APUs.

Alex

>
> Best Regards,
> Yifan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 12:21 AM
> To: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Zhang, Jesse(Jie) <Jesse.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; Zhang, Yifan <Yifan1.Zhang@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: try allowed domain when pin framebuffer failed
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 11:10 AM Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 07.12.22 um 17:08 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:52 AM Christian König
> > > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Am 07.12.22 um 16:38 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > >>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:23 AM Christian König
> > >>> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>> I would go a step further and just allow GTT domain on ASICs !=
> > >>>> CARRIZO
> > >>>> | STONEY.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I can't see a good reason we should still have any limitation
> > >>>> here, VRAM doesn't have any advantage any more as far as I know.
> > >>> Well, if VRAM is available we want to make sure someone uses it
> > >>> otherwise it's just wasted.
> > >> Well it still gets used when it's free. So now problem at all here.
> > >>
> > >> We should just not force anything into VRAM or GTT any more if it's
> > >> technically not necessary.
> > > So just this?
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > > index 919bbea2e3ac..8e8f07fa7a93 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > > @@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ u64 amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset_no_check(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
> > >   uint32_t amdgpu_bo_get_preferred_domain(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> > >                                              uint32_t domain)
> > >   {
> > > -       if (domain == (AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM | AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)) {
> >
> > We still need to keep this check to avoid trying to adjust VRAM only
> > allocations (the cursor still needs this IIRC).
> >
> > Apart from that I think that should work.
>
> Attached.  Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
> >
> > Christian.
> >
> > > +       if ((adev->asic_type == CHIP_CARRIZO) || (adev->asic_type ==
> > > CHIP_STONEY)) {
> > >                  domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM;
> > >                  if (adev->gmc.real_vram_size <= AMDGPU_SG_THRESHOLD)
> > >                          domain = AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> Christian.
> > >>
> > >>> Alex
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> Christian.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Am 07.12.22 um 16:10 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> > >>>>> Does this patch fix the problem?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:27 AM Zhang, Jesse(Jie) <Jesse.Zhang@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        drm/amdgpu: try allowed domain when pin framebuffer failed.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        [WHY&HOW]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        in some scenarios, the allocate memory often failed. such as do hot plug or play games.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        so we can try allowed domain, if the preferred domain cannot allocate memory.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        Signed-off-by: jie1zhan jesse.zhang@xxxxxxx
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>        Change-Id: I4b62e2ff072d02c515f901000a5789339d481273
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > >>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> index 1ae0c8723348..05fcaf7f9d92 100644
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> #include "amdgpu.h"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> #include "amdgpu_trace.h"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> #include "amdgpu_amdkfd.h"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +#include "amdgpu_display.h"
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> /**
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>      * DOC: amdgpu_object
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -942,8 +943,14 @@ int amdgpu_bo_pin_restricted(struct
> > >>>>>> amdgpu_bo *bo, u32 domain,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>                            bo->placements[i].lpfn = lpfn;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>            }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +       retry:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>            r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, &ctx);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>            if (unlikely(r)) {
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +               //try allowed domain when pin failed. just a workaround.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +               if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain !=
> > >>>>>> + bo->allowed_domains) {
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +                       amdgpu_bo_placement_from_domain(bo,
> > >>>>>> + bo->allowed_domains);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +                       goto retry;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +               }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>                    dev_err(adev->dev, "%p pin failed\n", bo);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>                    goto error;
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>            }
> >




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux