Hi Felix,
I just tested your patch. It works fine on my test set with the following little fix.
Regards,
Ma Jun
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
index 7ea3ec1e9e75..7d6fbfbfeb79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
@@ -1954,9 +1954,11 @@ static int kfd_topology_add_device_locked(struct kfd_dev *gpu, uint32_t gpu_id,
pr_err("Error creating VCRAT for GPU (ID: 0x%x)\n",
gpu_id);
topology_crat_proximity_domain--;
- return res;
+ goto err;
}
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&temp_topology_device_list);
+
res = kfd_parse_crat_table(crat_image,
&temp_topology_device_list,
proximity_domain);
@@ -1964,15 +1966,17 @@ static int kfd_topology_add_device_locked(struct kfd_dev *gpu, uint32_t gpu_id,
pr_err("Error parsing VCRAT for GPU (ID: 0x%x)\n",
gpu_id);
topology_crat_proximity_domain--;
- return res;
+ goto err;
}
kfd_topology_update_device_list(&temp_topology_device_list,
&topology_device_list);
*dev = kfd_assign_gpu(gpu);
- if (WARN_ON(!*dev))
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (WARN_ON(!*dev)) {
+ res = -ENODEV;
+ goto err;
+ }
/* Fill the cache affinity information here for the GPUs
* using VCRAT
@@ -1989,6 +1993,8 @@ static int kfd_topology_add_device_locked(struct kfd_dev *gpu, uint32_t gpu_id,
pr_err("Failed to update GPU (ID: 0x%x) to sysfs topology. res=%d\n",
gpu_id, res);
+err:
+ kfd_destroy_crat_image(crat_image);
return res;
}
@@ -2001,8 +2007,6 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
int i;
const char *asic_name = amdgpu_asic_name[gpu->adev->asic_type];
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&temp_topology_device_list);
-
gpu_id = kfd_generate_gpu_id(gpu);
pr_debug("Adding new GPU (ID: 0x%x) to topology\n", gpu_id);
@@ -2018,7 +2022,7 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
res = kfd_topology_add_device_locked(gpu, gpu_id, &dev);
up_write(&topology_lock);
if (res)
- goto err;
+ return res;
dev->gpu_id = gpu_id;
gpu->id = gpu_id;
@@ -2141,8 +2145,7 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
if (!res)
kfd_notify_gpu_change(gpu_id, 1);
-err:
- kfd_destroy_crat_image(crat_image);
+
return res;
}
On 11/17/2022 4:49 AM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
Am 2022-11-16 um 03:04 schrieb Ma Jun:
Release the topology_lock in error case
Signed-off-by: Ma Jun <Jun.Ma2@xxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Dan, did you change your email address, is this one correct?
Ma Jun, thanks for looking into this. Some of this problem predates your
patch that was flagged by Dan. I would prefer a more consistent and
robust handling of these error cases. I think everything inside the
topology lock could be moved into another function to simplify the error
handling. I'm attaching a completely untested patch to illustrate the idea.
Regards,
Felix
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
index ef9c6fdfb88d..5ea737337658 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_topology.c
@@ -1841,6 +1841,7 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
pr_err("Error creating VCRAT for GPU (ID: 0x%x)\n",
gpu_id);
topology_crat_proximity_domain--;
+ up_write(&topology_lock);
return res;
}
@@ -1851,6 +1852,7 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
pr_err("Error parsing VCRAT for GPU (ID: 0x%x)\n",
gpu_id);
topology_crat_proximity_domain--;
+ up_write(&topology_lock);
goto err;
}
@@ -1860,6 +1862,7 @@ int kfd_topology_add_device(struct kfd_dev *gpu)
dev = kfd_assign_gpu(gpu);
if (WARN_ON(!dev)) {
res = -ENODEV;
+ up_write(&topology_lock);
goto err;
}
