RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Enable full reset when RAS is supported on gc v11_0_0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Good point, thanks for the review. I will send a new one.



Thanks,
Candice

-----Original Message-----
From: Kuehling, Felix <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 11:54 AM
To: Li, Candice <Candice.Li@xxxxxxx>; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Enable full reset when RAS is supported on gc v11_0_0

Am 2022-09-07 um 21:10 schrieb Candice Li:
> Enable full reset for RAS supported configuration on gc v11_0_0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Candice Li <candice.li@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc21.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc21.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc21.c
> index a26c5723c46e27..81f32d77c98cd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc21.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc21.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,10 @@ static bool soc21_need_full_reset(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>   {
>   	switch (adev->ip_versions[GC_HWIP][0]) {
>   	case IP_VERSION(11, 0, 0):
> +		if (amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__UMC))
> +			return true;
> +		else
> +			return false;

Is there a reason why this can't be written simply as

     return amdgpu_ras_is_supported(adev, AMDGPU_RAS_BLOCK__UMC);


Regards,
   Felix


>   	case IP_VERSION(11, 0, 2):
>   		return false;
>   	default:




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux