Eric sent out the corresponding user mode patches to the mailing list as
well. It looks a bit weird, because it looks like they're part of the
same patch series. But patch 2 and 3 are actually user mode patches. The
interesting one is patch 3.
Do we still need a link to a user mode patch in this case?
Regards,
Felix
On 2022-07-12 09:57, Deucher, Alexander wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Can you please include a link to the proposed userspace in the commit
message when you commit this?
Alex
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* amd-gfx <amd-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Eric Huang <jinhuieric.huang@xxxxxxx>
*Sent:* Monday, July 11, 2022 2:41 PM
*To:* amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Cc:* Huang, JinHuiEric <JinHuiEric.Huang@xxxxxxx>; Kuehling, Felix
<Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: bump KFD version for unified ctx
save/restore memory
To expose unified memory for ctx save/resotre area feature
availablity to libhsakmt.
Signed-off-by: Eric Huang <jinhuieric.huang@xxxxxxx>
---
include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
index 7a423855a86e..afd8ff29c74f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/kfd_ioctl.h
@@ -36,9 +36,10 @@
* - 1.8 - CRIU - Support for SDMA transfers with GTT BOs
* - 1.9 - Add available memory ioctl
* - 1.10 - Add SMI profiler event log
+ * - 1.11 - Add unified memory for ctx save/restore area
*/
#define KFD_IOCTL_MAJOR_VERSION 1
-#define KFD_IOCTL_MINOR_VERSION 10
+#define KFD_IOCTL_MINOR_VERSION 11
struct kfd_ioctl_get_version_args {
__u32 major_version; /* from KFD */
--
2.25.1
