Hi Alex, Às 11:31 de 12/07/22, Alex Deucher escreveu: > This is not a compliant kerneldoc comment, so make it just > a regular comment. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn314/dcn314_optc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn314/dcn314_optc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn314/dcn314_optc.c > index c4a5f8198209..436c3545a983 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn314/dcn314_optc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dcn314/dcn314_optc.c > @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ > #define FN(reg_name, field_name) \ > optc1->tg_shift->field_name, optc1->tg_mask->field_name > > -/** > +/* > * Enable CRTC > * Enable CRTC - call ASIC Control Object to enable Timing generator. > */ This comment is placed in a random part of the file, the proper fix it would be to place it above the function that it's describing: static bool optc314_enable_crtc(struct timing_generator *optc) There it could even be a correct kerneldoc comment, fixed the function name and adding the argument description.
