On 5/24/2022 8:42 AM, Somalapuram, Amaranath wrote:
On 5/20/2022 7:52 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
On 5/20/2022 3:49 PM, Somalapuram Amaranath wrote:
Added device coredump information:
- Kernel version
- Module
- Time
- VRAM status
- Guilty process name and PID
- GPU register dumps
Signed-off-by: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h | 3 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 62 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
index c79d9992b113..f28d9c563f74 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
@@ -1044,6 +1044,9 @@ struct amdgpu_device {
uint32_t *reset_dump_reg_list;
uint32_t *reset_dump_reg_value;
int num_regs;
+ struct amdgpu_task_info reset_context_task_info;
+ bool reset_context_vram_lost;
How about drop the 'context' from name and just reset_task_info and
reset_vram_lost ?
OK.
+ struct timespec64 reset_time;
struct amdgpu_reset_domain *reset_domain;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index 963c897a76e6..f9b710e741a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/iommu.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/devcoredump.h>
+#include <generated/utsrelease.h>
#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
#include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
@@ -4733,6 +4735,55 @@ static int amdgpu_reset_reg_dumps(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
+static ssize_t amdgpu_devcoredump_read(char *buffer, loff_t offset,
+ size_t count, void *data, size_t datalen)
+{
+ struct drm_printer p;
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = data;
+ struct drm_print_iterator iter;
+ int i;
+
A NULL check for 'buffer' here could prevent a segfault later.
Agreed.
+ iter.data = buffer;
+ iter.offset = 0;
+ iter.start = offset;
+ iter.remain = count;
+
+ p = drm_coredump_printer(&iter);
+
+ drm_printf(&p, "**** AMDGPU Device Coredump ****\n");
+ drm_printf(&p, "kernel: " UTS_RELEASE "\n");
+ drm_printf(&p, "module: " KBUILD_MODNAME "\n");
+ drm_printf(&p, "time: %lld.%09ld\n", adev->reset_time.tv_sec,
adev->reset_time.tv_nsec);
+ if (adev->reset_context_task_info.pid)
+ drm_printf(&p, "process_name: %s PID: %d\n",
+ adev->reset_context_task_info.process_name,
+ adev->reset_context_task_info.pid);
Please fix the alignment of print variables.
I will cross check this.
+
+ if (adev->reset_context_vram_lost)
+ drm_printf(&p, "VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n");
+ if (adev->num_regs) {
+ drm_printf(&p, "AMDGPU register dumps:\nOffset: Value:\n");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < adev->num_regs; i++)
+ drm_printf(&p, "0x%08x: 0x%08x\n",
+ adev->reset_dump_reg_list[i],
+ adev->reset_dump_reg_value[i]);
+ }
+
+ return count - iter.remain;
+}
+
+static void amdgpu_reset_capture_coredumpm(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = adev_to_drm(adev);
+
+ ktime_get_ts64(&adev->reset_time);
+ dev_coredumpm(dev->dev, THIS_MODULE, adev, 0, GFP_KERNEL,
+ amdgpu_devcoredump_read, NULL);
instead of registering NULL as free function, I would prefer you to
have a dummy no_op free function registered, which we can consume if
something changes.
you mean something like this (function without any code):
staticvoidamdgpu_devcoredump_free(void*data)
{
}
Yes, precisely.
+}
+#endif
+
int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct list_head *device_list_handle,
struct amdgpu_reset_context *reset_context)
{
@@ -4817,6 +4868,14 @@ int amdgpu_do_asic_reset(struct list_head
*device_list_handle,
goto out;
vram_lost = amdgpu_device_check_vram_lost(tmp_adev);
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEV_COREDUMP
+ tmp_adev->reset_context_vram_lost = vram_lost;
+ tmp_adev->reset_context_task_info.pid = 0;
why is the PID hardcoded to 0 ?
in case of reset context reset_context->job->vm is null (possibility
that reset can be non VM related).
If we don't set tmp_adev->reset_context_task_info.pid = 0, it will show
previous reset valid PID.
But when the VM is not NULL, are we updating this PID somewhere ? I did
not see that happening in this series.
- Shashank
Regards,
S.Amarnath
+ if (reset_context->job && reset_context->job->vm)
+ tmp_adev->reset_context_task_info =
+ reset_context->job->vm->task_info;
+ amdgpu_reset_capture_coredumpm(tmp_adev);
+#endif
if (vram_lost) {
DRM_INFO("VRAM is lost due to GPU reset!\n");
- Shashank
amdgpu_inc_vram_lost(tmp_adev);
