[Public] > -----Original Message----- > From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2022 05:33 > To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Limonciello, Mario > <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: amd | ASUS ROG Strix G513QY fails to resume from > suspend [regression] (#2008) > > On 10.05.22 10:37, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Dear Linux regressions folks, > > > > A user reported a regression [1], which also trickled down to the stable > > series, for example between 5.15.13 and 5.15.14. > > > > [1]: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitla > b.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F- > %2Fissues%2F2008&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com% > 7C48555e8619c04186687808da327076c3%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e > 183d%7C0%7C0%7C637877755868268003%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% > 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5m%2BEztsZA9qBT8vUSHVnvBCTBnB%2Bar > U%2FnZqa3MC3lmA%3D&reserved=0 > > Many thx for forwarding. I'll add it to the tracking to ensure it's not > forgotten: > > #regzbot introduced: 887f75cfd0da44c19dd > #regzbot from: spin83 > #regzbot title: drm: amdgpu: ASUS ROG Strix G513QY fails to resume from > suspend > #regzbot link: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitla > b.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Famd%2F- > %2Fissues%2F2008&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com% > 7C48555e8619c04186687808da327076c3%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e > 183d%7C0%7C0%7C637877755868268003%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% > 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5m%2BEztsZA9qBT8vUSHVnvBCTBnB%2Bar > U%2FnZqa3MC3lmA%3D&reserved=0 > > Maybe the culprit is actually daf8de0874ab5b74b38a38726fdd3d, the report > is not clear on that, I just picked the newest the reporter mentioned > for now. > > See the ticket for details, there were a few replies already. According > to Paul the problems trickled down to the stable series, for example > between 5.15.13 and 5.15.14. The discussion is trending to a revert. The revert is submitted here: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/485708/ > > Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) > -- > P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of > reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like > this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public > reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight. > > P.P.S.: This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already > discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when > the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or > something else totally wrong? Then just reply -- ideally with also > telling regzbot about it, as explained here: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flinux > -regtracking.leemhuis.info%2Ftracked- > regression%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com%7C4 > 8555e8619c04186687808da327076c3%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183 > d%7C0%7C0%7C637877755868268003%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJW > IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C > 3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=od7XqKGQVoduIldm71Dfj42Vhq2oHuHFpLAtL > B2nLvE%3D&reserved=0
