On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:36 AM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That hunk somehow got missing while solving the conflict between the TTM
> and AMDGPU changes for drm-next.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> index 7761a3ea172e..88de9f0d4728 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm_pt.c
> @@ -631,9 +631,13 @@ static void amdgpu_vm_pt_free(struct amdgpu_vm_bo_base *entry)
> if (!entry->bo)
> return;
> shadow = amdgpu_bo_shadowed(entry->bo);
> + if (shadow) {
> + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&shadow->tbo, NULL);
> + amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
> + }
> + ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(&entry->bo->tbo, NULL);
> entry->bo->vm_bo = NULL;
> list_del(&entry->vm_status);
> - amdgpu_bo_unref(&shadow);
> amdgpu_bo_unref(&entry->bo);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
