On 2022-05-02 09:28, Modem, Bhanuprakash wrote: > On Fri-29-04-2022 08:02 pm, Murthy, Arun R wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Intel-gfx <intel-gfx-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of >>> Bhanuprakash Modem >>> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2022 3:21 PM >>> To: intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>> amd- >>> gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>> ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; harry.wentland@xxxxxxx; Sharma, Swati2 >>> <swati2.sharma@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [V2 3/3] drm/amd/display: Move connector debugfs to >>> drm >>> >>> As drm_connector already have the display_info, instead of creating >>> "output_bpc" debugfs in vendor specific driver, move the logic to the >>> drm >>> layer. >>> >>> This patch will also move "Current" bpc to the crtc debugfs from >>> connector >>> debugfs, since we are getting this info from crtc_state. >>> >>> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@xxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@xxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks Arun, > > @Harry/@Rodrigo, If this change sounds good to you, can you please help > to push it? > This changes the output_bpc debugfs behavior on amdgpu and breaks the amd_max_bpc IGT test. I don't think we should merge this as-is. This patch also seems dependent on patch 1 of the series. Shouldn't they be merged together (please don't merge them as-is, though)? Harry > - Bhanu > >> >> Thanks and Regards, >> Arun R Murthy >> -------------------- >
