On maandag 21 maart 2022 19:49:56 CET Dominique Dumont wrote: > On Monday, 21 March 2022 09:57:59 CET Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Dominique/Salvatore/Eric, what's the status of this regression? > > According to the debian bug tracker the problem is solved with 5.16 and > > 5.17, but was 5.15 ever fixed? > > I don't think so. > > On kernel side, the commit fixing this issue is > e55a3aea418269266d84f426b3bd70794d3389c8 . > > According to the logs of [1] , this commit landed in v5.17-rc3 It was included in 5.15.22, but the newest 5.15 kernel uploaded to Debian was 5.15.15, so their is no fixed 5.15 in Debian. It was also included in 5.16.8 and the earlier version in Debian which had that commit was 5.16.10 (uploaded 2022-02-18 to Unstable). Current version in Unstable is 5.16.14. Testing/Bookworm now had 5.16.12. In Experimental, on 2022-02-12, 5.17-rc3 was uploaded. HTH, Diederik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
