Am 2022-03-08 um 12:11 schrieb Nathan Chancellor:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 04:05:13PM +0800, Yifan Zhang wrote:
Fix the NULL point issue:
[ 3076.255609] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
[ 3076.255624] #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode
[ 3076.255637] #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page
[ 3076.255649] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 3076.255660] Oops: 0010 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[ 3076.255669] CPU: 20 PID: 2415 Comm: kfdtest Tainted: G W OE 5.11.0-41-generic #45~20.04.1-Ubuntu
[ 3076.255691] Hardware name: AMD Splinter/Splinter-RPL, BIOS VS2326337N.FD 02/07/2022
[ 3076.255706] RIP: 0010:0x0
[ 3076.255718] Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0xffffffffffffffd6.
[ 3076.255732] RSP: 0018:ffffb64283e3fc10 EFLAGS: 00010297
[ 3076.255744] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000008 RCX: 0000000000000027
[ 3076.255759] RDX: ffffb64283e3fc1e RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: ffff8c7a87f60000
[ 3076.255776] RBP: ffffb64283e3fc78 R08: ffff8c7d88518ac0 R09: ffffb64283e3fa60
[ 3076.255791] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 000000000000000f
[ 3076.255805] R13: ffff8c7bdcea5800 R14: ffff8c7a9f3f3000 R15: ffff8c7a8696bc00
[ 3076.255820] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8c7d88500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 3076.255839] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 3076.255851] CR2: ffffffffffffffd6 CR3: 0000000109e3c000 CR4: 0000000000750ee0
[ 3076.255866] PKRU: 55555554
[ 3076.255873] Call Trace:
[ 3076.255884] dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts+0x72/0x160 [amdgpu]
[ 3076.256025] process_termination_cpsch.cold+0x26/0x2f [amdgpu]
[ 3076.256182] ? ktime_get_mono_fast_ns+0x4e/0xa0
[ 3076.256196] kfd_process_dequeue_from_all_devices+0x49/0x70 [amdgpu]
[ 3076.256328] kfd_process_notifier_release+0x187/0x2b0 [amdgpu]
[ 3076.256451] ? mn_itree_inv_end+0xdc/0x110
[ 3076.256463] __mmu_notifier_release+0x74/0x1f0
[ 3076.256474] exit_mmap+0x170/0x200
[ 3076.256484] ? __handle_mm_fault+0x677/0x920
[ 3076.256496] ? _cond_resched+0x19/0x30
[ 3076.256507] mmput+0x5d/0x130
[ 3076.256518] do_exit+0x332/0xaf0
[ 3076.256526] ? handle_mm_fault+0xd7/0x2b0
[ 3076.256537] do_group_exit+0x43/0xa0
[ 3076.256548] __x64_sys_exit_group+0x18/0x20
[ 3076.256559] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
[ 3076.256569] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zhang@xxxxxxx>
---
.../drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
index 1cd2ea536bd0..77364afdc606 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c
@@ -505,14 +505,16 @@ static int dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(struct kfd_dev *dev, struct kfd_process
* to check which VMID the current process is mapped to.
*/
- for (vmid = first_vmid_to_scan; vmid <= last_vmid_to_scan; vmid++) {
- status = dev->kfd2kgd->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info
- (dev->adev, vmid, &queried_pasid);
-
- if (status && queried_pasid == p->pasid) {
- pr_debug("Killing wave fronts of vmid %d and pasid 0x%x\n",
- vmid, p->pasid);
- break;
+ if (dev->kfd2kgd->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info) {
+ for (vmid = first_vmid_to_scan; vmid <= last_vmid_to_scan; vmid++) {
+ status = dev->kfd2kgd->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info
+ (dev->adev, vmid, &queried_pasid);
+
+ if (status && queried_pasid == p->pasid) {
+ pr_debug("Killing wave fronts of vmid %d and pasid 0x%x\n",
+ vmid, p->pasid);
+ break;
+ }
}
}
--
2.25.1
Apologies if this has been reported and fixed already, I have not seen
it if it has.
This patch as commit c8b0507f40de ("drm/amdkfd: judge
get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info before call") in -next causes the
following clang warning, which appears to be legitimate.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:508:6: error: variable 'vmid' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (dev->kfd2kgd->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:521:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
if (vmid > last_vmid_to_scan) {
^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:508:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
if (dev->kfd2kgd->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_device_queue_manager.c:490:19: note: initialize the variable 'vmid' to silence this warning
unsigned int vmid;
^
= 0
1 error generated.
Should this function bail out earlier if
->get_atc_vmid_pasid_mapping_info() is NULL, rather than skipping the
for loop?
I agree.
Regards,
Felix
Cheers,
Nathan
