Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: remove min_order BUG_ON check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/03/22 8:15 pm, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2022, Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> place BUG_ON(order < min_order) outside do..while
>> loop as it fails Unigine Heaven benchmark.
>>
>> Unigine Heaven has buffer allocation requests for
>> example required pages are 161 and alignment request
>> is 128. To allocate the remaining 33 pages, continues
>> the iteration to find the order value which is 5 and
>> when it compares with min_order = 7, enables the
>> BUG_ON(). To avoid this problem, placed the BUG_ON
>> check outside of do..while loop.
> 
> How about turning these BUG_ON()s to WARN_ON()s with an error return?
> What's the point in oopsing?
> 
yes, we will use WARN_ON with an error return

Thanks,
Arun
> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> index 72f52f293249..ed94c56b720f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> @@ -669,10 +669,11 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>>  	order = fls(pages) - 1;
>>  	min_order = ilog2(min_page_size) - ilog2(mm->chunk_size);
>>  
>> +	BUG_ON(order < min_order);
>> +
>>  	do {
>>  		order = min(order, (unsigned int)fls(pages) - 1);
>>  		BUG_ON(order > mm->max_order);
>> -		BUG_ON(order < min_order);
>>  
>>  		do {
>>  			if (flags & DRM_BUDDY_RANGE_ALLOCATION)
>>
>> base-commit: 8025c79350b90e5a8029234d433578f12abbae2b
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux