Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: use ktime rather than jiffies for benchmark results

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 2022-02-21 um 17:30 schrieb Alex Deucher:
To protect against wraparounds.

Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c | 31 ++++++++++---------
  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
index 92a2ffefe62e..3136a9ad2d54 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_benchmark.c
@@ -29,14 +29,13 @@
  #define AMDGPU_BENCHMARK_COMMON_MODES_N 17
static int amdgpu_benchmark_do_move(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned size,
-				    uint64_t saddr, uint64_t daddr, int n)
+				    uint64_t saddr, uint64_t daddr, int n, s64 *time_ms)
  {
-	unsigned long start_jiffies;
-	unsigned long end_jiffies;
+	ktime_t stime, etime;
  	struct dma_fence *fence;
  	int i, r;
- start_jiffies = jiffies;
+	stime = ktime_get();
  	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
  		struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring;
  		r = amdgpu_copy_buffer(ring, saddr, daddr, size, NULL, &fence,
@@ -48,25 +47,28 @@ static int amdgpu_benchmark_do_move(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned size,
  		if (r)
  			goto exit_do_move;
  	}
-	end_jiffies = jiffies;
-	r = jiffies_to_msecs(end_jiffies - start_jiffies);
exit_do_move:
+	etime = ktime_get();
+	*time_ms = ktime_ms_delta(etime, stime);

Milliseconds are pretty coarse. Would it make sense to use microseconds (ktime_us_delta) to get more accurate measurements instead?

Regards,
  Felix


+
  	return r;
  }
static void amdgpu_benchmark_log_results(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
  					 int n, unsigned size,
-					 unsigned int time,
+					 s64 time_ms,
  					 unsigned sdomain, unsigned ddomain,
  					 char *kind)
  {
-	unsigned int throughput = (n * (size >> 10)) / time;
+	s64 throughput = (n * (size >> 10));
+
+	throughput = div64_s64(throughput, time_ms);
dev_info(adev->dev, "amdgpu: %s %u bo moves of %u kB from"
-		 " %d to %d in %u ms, throughput: %u Mb/s or %u MB/s\n",
-		 kind, n, size >> 10, sdomain, ddomain, time,
+		 " %d to %d in %lld ms, throughput: %lld Mb/s or %lld MB/s\n",
+		 kind, n, size >> 10, sdomain, ddomain, time_ms,
  		 throughput * 8, throughput);
  }
@@ -76,6 +78,7 @@ static int amdgpu_benchmark_move(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned size,
  	struct amdgpu_bo *dobj = NULL;
  	struct amdgpu_bo *sobj = NULL;
  	uint64_t saddr, daddr;
+	s64 time_ms;
  	int r, n;
n = AMDGPU_BENCHMARK_ITERATIONS;
@@ -96,11 +99,11 @@ static int amdgpu_benchmark_move(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned size,
  		goto out_cleanup;
if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs) {
-		r = amdgpu_benchmark_do_move(adev, size, saddr, daddr, n);
-		if (r < 0)
+		r = amdgpu_benchmark_do_move(adev, size, saddr, daddr, n, &time_ms);
+		if (r)
  			goto out_cleanup;
-		if (r > 0)
-			amdgpu_benchmark_log_results(adev, n, size, r,
+		else
+			amdgpu_benchmark_log_results(adev, n, size, time_ms,
  						     sdomain, ddomain, "dma");
  	}



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux